|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
FinnAgain Zero
Roving Guns Inc.
RAZOR Alliance
   |
Posted - 2011.03.18 22:02:00 -
[1]
More bitter: lemon, or windy?
Hard to tell... will someone volunteer to bite windy and find out?
------------------------------------------------
Hohohoho, Mister
Finn, you're going to be Mister Finnagain! |
FinnAgain Zero
Roving Guns Inc.
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.03.18 22:10:00 -
[2]
Well, aside from windy's new conspiracy theory, this is a somewhat interesting bit, but:
 Originally by: E man Industries
More theatrics over minior preseieved slights as big news?
GM/dev incompetence is a big, big deal. That we're dealing with a corporation that was surprised to learn that there was significant module lag in fleet fights is a bad thing. That the most expensive ships in the game, which require alliance-wide support for their production and use, can be destroyed not through pilot error but by blatantly broken game mechanics where ships stay in system for hours after their pilots log off? that's simply unacceptable.
We deserve a game whose basic features work.
------------------------------------------------
Hohohoho, Mister
Finn, you're going to be Mister Finnagain! |
FinnAgain Zero
Roving Guns Inc.
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.03.18 23:07:00 -
[3]
Nah, not GM alt, just generic troll.
------------------------------------------------
Hohohoho, Mister
Finn, you're going to be Mister Finnagain! |
FinnAgain Zero
Roving Guns Inc.
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.03.19 00:21:00 -
[4]
Do they sell crazy by the bushel, or do they use metric these days?
------------------------------------------------
Hohohoho, Mister
Finn, you're going to be Mister Finnagain! |
FinnAgain Zero
Roving Guns Inc.
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.03.19 01:27:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Lady Spanky
Your paymaster
So... bushels then?
------------------------------------------------
Hohohoho, Mister
Finn, you're going to be Mister Finnagain! |
FinnAgain Zero
Roving Guns Inc.
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.03.19 02:03:00 -
[6]
This is now a WIDOT thread.
------------------------------------------------
Hohohoho, Mister
Finn, you're going to be Mister Finnagain! |
FinnAgain Zero
Roving Guns Inc.
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.03.19 03:18:00 -
[7]
Edited by: FinnAgain Zero on 19/03/2011 03:24:27
Originally by: Kalle Demos
FinnAgain Zero - Yeah, still ignoring your posts
Hey, hey Finn! Finn! I'm not listening to you!!! Can you hear me? I said I'm totally ignoring you! Finn? Did you hear me!?! Hey, I'm ignoring you!!!
By the way, speaking of your obvious trolling, found a cite yet to prove that the NC only had 20 titans and about 8 motherships, among all their member alliances? How about proof that any single NC supercapital pilot had their loss removed (and somehow also removed from hostile boards, go figure)? How about a cite to show that Razor has set AAA and AtlasDOT blue?
No?
Yeah...
------------------------------------------------
Hohohoho, Mister
Finn, you're going to be Mister Finnagain! |
FinnAgain Zero
Roving Guns Inc.
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.03.19 05:15:00 -
[8]
Hell, if it was a Mittspicracy, Vuk would have endorsed Mittens as the only hope for EVE.
------------------------------------------------
Hohohoho, Mister
Finn, you're going to be Mister Finnagain! |
FinnAgain Zero
Roving Guns Inc.
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.03.20 07:48:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Marconus Orion
Originally by: The Mittani
ex-tri posters remind me a lot of bob posters; their arguments all amount to a smug declaration that they and only they know the 'right' way to play eve online, followed by demands that anyone else's way of playing be removed asap 'for the good of the game'
There will never be a 100% agreement between players on how the game should be.
Except, of course, this ignores the actual issue.
Most nullsec folks simply want to play the game they want to play it. If other people want to form small pirate alliances, or mercenary alliances, or play in lowsec, or play in FW in lowsec, or play in wormholes, or run missions in Empire until their fingers fall off, then they're fine with that. They just want to play the game their way.
Then there are others who declare that small PvP is better than everything. Or mid-sized PvP is better than everything. Or roaming gangs are better than everything. Or what have you. And then they declare that the game mechanics themselves have to be changed to boost that play style and nerf opposing play styles. Some go even further and rage while trying to argue for reasons that people shouldn't freely associate in a sandbox game and form political structures as they see fit in a game that's driven by player-created content.
Quote:
I am one of the players who would like to see smaller local wars in 0.0. In order for this to happen it means iteration on the sov system, moons, POS's, local resources, more space, mining, nerf, boosts, balancing, blah, blah, blah...
Actually, it means you need to find some other people who also want small local wars, and go fight them instead of trying to change those who want large, trans-regional wars.
It's a solution so obvious that you've gone right past it and onto trying to force through game mechanics changes to stop other people playing the way they want. It's just as wrong, and for the same reasons, as someone who only wanted large-scale inter-regional conflicts and demanded that small fleets be nerfed.
Quote:
Is Goonswarm still on its first version?
For all practical purposes, yes.
The Goons did not cascade anymore than BoB/KenZoku did before we kicked them out of their space.
------------------------------------------------
Hohohoho, Mister
Finn, you're going to be Mister Finnagain! |
FinnAgain Zero
Roving Guns Inc.
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.03.20 08:55:00 -
[10]
Edited by: FinnAgain Zero on 20/03/2011 08:56:43
Originally by: Marconus Orion
you are basically saying is that you believe all the players in 0.0, when it comes to PvP should be between huge power blocks and if it is small to medium sized PvP they should go somewhere else besides 0.0
No. Not only is that not "basically" what I said, it has absolutely nothing to do with what I said.
And of course not all 0.0 mechanics are working perfectly. But that also has nothing to do with your desire to deliberately alter game mechanics in order nerf play styles you don't like in order boost play styles you do like.
------------------------------------------------
Hohohoho, Mister
Finn, you're going to be Mister Finnagain! |
|
|
FinnAgain Zero
Roving Guns Inc.
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.03.20 09:59:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Marconus Orion
Then what are you saying?
Hint: what I actually said.
Originally by: Marconus Orion
without actually saying anything.
Your failure to comprehend is not an error on my part.
------------------------------------------------
Hohohoho, Mister
Finn, you're going to be Mister Finnagain! |
FinnAgain Zero
Roving Guns Inc.
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.03.22 00:33:00 -
[12]
Originally by: General Windypops
Keep working on those "solid reasoning and comprehension skills", kiddo. 
No, see, in order for an insult about reading skills to have any weight, the person saying it has to not demonstrate their cluelessness in that very comment. Mittens said, correctly, that CCP treats the CSM as a focus group. That doesn't mean that they don't care about them, just that they care about them only as a focus group. This is basic.
Then again, as you're still hunting after a conspiracy theory, maybe that point is lost.
------------------------------------------------
Hohohoho, Mister
Finn, you're going to be Mister Finnagain! |
|
|
| |
|